Connect
Issues
Tag Cloud
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
Subscribe
The mechanics of reapportionment - who gains and loses?
The mechanics of reapportionment - who gains and loses?
CBS News recently published an in-depth report on reapportionment following the 2010 Census, including which states might gain, which might lose, and how that will impact political power in America.
Congressional reapportionment and redistricting are closely related, but it’s important to understand their separate impacts. Any state with more than one congressional district can be redistricted to favor one party or another. But in states that gain or lose seats, political control in the state legislatures will be crucial in determining which party the extra districts favor or, in states that lose seats, which party’s congressperson loses his or her district.
According to projections, those states will likely be:
| State | Possible loss (est.) | State | Possible gain (est.) |
| Illinois | -1 | Arizona | +1 or 2 |
| Iowa | -1 | Florida | +1 |
| Louisiana | -1 | Georgia | +1 |
| Massachusetts | -1 | Nevada | +1 |
| Michigan | -1 | North Carolina | 0 or +1 |
| Minnesota | 0 or -1 | Oregon | 0 or +1 |
| New Jersey | -1 | Texas | +3 or 4 |
| New York | -1 | Utah | +1 |
| Ohio | -2 | Washington | +1 |
| Pennsylvania | -1 |
Discounting states that redistrict though non-partisan commissions, Democrats currently hold majorities in many of the states set to gain or lose seats, while many of the Republican-held states in the South may have to create additional majority-minority districts to satisfy the Voting Rights Act.
But CBS also looked at the impact of reapportionment on future Presidential elections, in which the South and West are likely to gain electoral votes while the Northeast and Midwest lose them:
Electoral votes are shifted, too. Unlike the House, where district lines could determine which party gains advantage from a new apportionment, the presidential maps' winner-take-all formulas go directly to the totals. This means new electoral math, and perhaps a revised list of battlegrounds.
Voting differences by region are well-known even to casual political watchers: the Northeast is now solidly Democrat and often liberal (in fact, there are no GOP House members in New England at all) while the deep South and much of the Midwest remain strong Republican territory.
Of course, all such projections depend on an accurate Census count with full participation. We’ve already discussed what a challenge this is. And with participation rates in the Midwest running noticeably ahead of the South, the final congressional allocation could include some surprises.
Thanks for this. Reapportionment and redistricting are so important, but they sneak past many people's radars. I've set up an ActBlue page to get campaign donations to candidates in races that will affect redistricting. I've included the DLCC there. http://www.actblue.com/page/bluedistricts







