Connect
Issues
Tag Cloud
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
Subscribe
Progress in the struggle against domestic violence
Progress in the struggle against domestic violence
The Iowa and Arizona Senates both took action recently to protect their states’ citizens from domestic violence, as well as to prevent violence from escalating to tragedy.
Iowa’s SF 2357, which passed on a bipartisan 36-11 vote, takes the commonsense step of prohibiting individuals with protective orders or criminal convictions against them for domestic abuse from possessing firearms. As the Democratic Caucus explains, support for this bill is based on the facts surrounding domestic violence:
Since 1995, guns have been used in more than half of all Iowa murders involving domestic abuse. Fifty-four percent of women killed by an intimate partner were shot; 50 percent of men killed by an intimate partner were shot; and 57 percent of children and bystanders killed in domestic violence attacks were shot.
Meanwhile, Arizona Senate Democrats unanimously supported two new bills aimed at making domestic violence easier to prosecute:
SB 1087, which passed 20-8, would add homicide, manslaughter, animal cruelty and sexual assault to the list of crimes that when committed against a family member or intimate partner count as domestic violence.
Given the shameful example of Republican legislators in other states on similar issues recently, it should come as no surprise that all eight of the “no” votes on this bill were cast by Republicans and included both the Senate President and the Republican Majority Leader.
A separate bill approved on the same day would upgrade the choking of a partner to a Class 4 felony. This is an important change for policymakers fighting to end the tragic outcomes that so often follow domestic violence:
[E]xperts consider choking, which can render the victim unconscious in 10 seconds, to be a serious risk factor for escalation to homicide...
Nearly half of female homicide and attempted homicide victims were choked in the past year by their male partner, according to an article in the Journal of Emergency Medicine.
All bills now move on to their respective State Houses for consideration.
I lived in Texas when a certain Republican (who noone thought had a prayer against a popular governor) ended up winning due to exactly those tactic. Gerrymandering used to against the law...what happened? When Bush won the governorship everyone was stunned, it was only after the fact that everyone realized what a difference selective redistricting can make; especially to the unwary majority.
Please stand up and be heard!
G. D. Osburn
I have been a victim of domestic violence and date rape. Neither time did I feel anyone really would listen and take it seriously. The former I was told by the officer that nothing probably would be done and maybe I would just make things worse for myself if I push it. In the latter incident I was told by the female clinic physiscians assistant that I will have an extremely difficult time getting anything done about it. If these things happened to a man I think the outcomes would have been very different and in fact the amount of women in prison for fighting back against their abusers tells a story that not many hear.
I hope you push on for these basic rights...not privileges; so women do not have to live in fear, knowing no one will listen.
GDOsburn







