Connect
Issues
Tag Cloud
Archives
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
Subscribe
Looking at 2010
Looking at 2010
The stakes could not be higher for the coming election cycle, and the DLCC has already begun working to ensure that Democrats will win these crucial legislative races.
As part of that effort, we want to keep our supporters informed about where we stand heading into 2009-2010.
Where we are
In 2008, the DLCC successfully defended chambers in Iowa, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Maine, New Hampshire, North Carolina, and Colorado, and we made serious additional gains in two chambers we originally thought we'd be hard pressed to hold -- the Michigan House and Oregon House.
Of our 13 targeted chambers, we only lost Democratic majorities in two places: the Tennessee House and Montana Senate.
Our political team targeted nine Republican-held chambers as possible pickup opportunities.
On Election Day, we won new majorities in five of them: the Delaware House, Ohio House, Wisconsin Assembly, New York Senate, and the Nevada Senate. We made strong gains in the Texas House and forced a tie in the Montana House.
Across the country, Democrats now hold more than 55 percent of the nation's partisan legislative seats. We once again made net gains, adding approximately 100 seats to our column. We control 61 of the nation's 98 partisan legislative chambers. And Democratic leaders are at the helm of both the legislature and governor’s office in 17 states, while Republicans hold equivalent control of governments in just eight states.
The stakes for the future
As we head into this next election cycle,the stakes could not be higher. Our wins over the past six years have significantly increased the number of chambers that we needed to defend and narrowed the field of potential pickup opportunities.
Traditionally, the party that controls the White House has fared poorly in the first midterm election after the new president takes office. In terms of state legislative races in these cycles, the party of presidential power made gains only twice in the 20th century -- when voters supported FDR and Democrats during the Great Depression and when voters turned out for George W. Bush and Republicans in the first election after September 11th.
But it is crucial, both for the future of our party and our country that Democrats do well in 2009 and 2010, as this cycle represents final set of elections before the next round of legislative redistricting.
When the 2010 Census is completed, legislatures in 36 states will meet to draw the lines for 383 of the nation's 435 Congressional districts.
In the 2000 Election, Republicans gained control of a majority of the nation’s legislative chambers. They completely dominated all three branches of government in states that we all recognize as competitive: Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida.
In 2002, the first election after the 2000 redistricting, 17 Congressional seats changed hands – 15 of these 17 shifted largely due to legislatively-drawn map changes.
Because Republicans controlled a majority of the nation’s state houses, the GOP was able to improve its margins in the U.S. House of Representatives, gain control of five state legislative chambers, and finish the year with more Republican state legislators than Democrats nationwide for the first time since the 1950s.
This outcome of this election cycle will have long term ramifications.
Outlook 2009
The cycle begins with one set of targeted races in 2009.
In the Virginia House of Delegates, Republicans hold a 53/45 majority.
Two years ago, the DLCC worked with Democrats in the state to win a majority in the Senate for the first time in a decade. That same night, we added four seats to our margins in the lower chamber. In February of 2008, we picked up another seat in the House in a special election.
There are at least six seats currently held by Republicans in districts that Obama won which will be on our target list in the fall.
Despite our recent success, Republicans are confident that they will be able to retain control of the chamber. This is guaranteed to be a tightly contested series of elections, and national observers will watch the outcome closely as a barometer of things to come.
Outlook 2010
In 2010, 46 states will hold legislative elections. Nationwide, 1155 Senate seats and 4598 House seats will be up for grabs.
Because we control 60 of the 98 chambers, we recognize that we have a lot of territory to protect.
We do, however, have a limited number of opportunities for additional pickups.
At this stage, our list of targeted chambers includes the Kentucky Senate, Michigan Senate, Missouri House, Pennsylvania Senate, and Texas Senate.
We are particularly committed to picking up the Texas House, where Democrats have made tremendous strides over the last few cycles and are only down one seat.
We will also be looking at taking back the Tennessee House, Oklahoma Senate, and Montana Senate, as well as breaking the ties in the Montana House and the Alaska Senate.
Conclusion
Barring a “sea-change” election like we saw in 2006 -– after nearly a decade of Republican scandals -– the maps created after 2010 will dictate political realities for the next decade.
To ensure that our leaders are able to promote a Democratic agenda at every level of government, we must not lose ground in this election cycle.
The DLCC is dedicated to this goal, but we will rely on support from allies like you to be successful over the course of the next two years.
Your contributions help us build state-of-the-art campaign organizations, field talented candidates, and equip Democrats in competitive races with the tools they need to win.
Please contact us if you are interested in doing more to support our mission.
I'm thrilled that you guys are activating this far out. I would note that crucial to redistricting will be not just gaining, but holding what we have. We don't want to lose ground in states like Wisconsin (where we have the governor's mansion and legislature, controlling redistricting), Colorado (ditto), New York (ditto), Ohio (governor's mansion and House), Pennsylvania (ditto), Louisiana (legislature), Indiana (House), or Nevada (legislature).







