Connect
Issues
Tag Cloud
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
Subscribe
Missouri Republican Seeks to Repeal Child Labor Laws
Missouri Republican Seeks to Repeal Child Labor Laws
Republicans across the country continue to demonstrate a disturbing disconnection from issues affecting women and children.
On the heels of a drive to repeal equal pay legislation, an attempt to re-label victims of rape as “accusers,” and attacks on schools and education, a GOP state Senator in
Republican Sen. Jane Cunningham has introduced Senate Bill 222, which would repeal certain provisions of child labor statutes. Quoting from the bill summary,
- This act modifies the child labor laws.
- It eliminates the prohibition on employment of children under age fourteen.
- Restrictions on the number of hours and restrictions on when a child may work during the day are also removed.
- It also repeals the requirement that a child ages fourteen or fifteen obtain a work certificate or work permit in order to be employed.
- Children under sixteen will also be allowed to work in any capacity in a motel, resort or hotel where sleeping accommodations are furnished.
- It also removes the authority of the director of the Division of Labor Standards to inspect employers who employ children and to require them to keep certain records for children they employ.
- It also repeals the presumption that the presence of a child in a workplace is evidence of employment.
If Sen. Cunningham has her way, 13-year-olds will have to stop freeloading off of their parents and go get themselves jobs. Teenagers of all ages would get to flip burgers or work the drive-through window all night—what good are morning classes, anyway? Under her bill, a 12- or-13-year-old could be sent to work full time, perhaps under the pretense of receiving a home-school education.
And the idea of children younger than 16 working unrestricted hours “in any capacity” in a hotel should in itself raise concerns about this Dickensian legislation.
Childhood? Who needs it? Perhaps Sen. Cunningham regrets her years of wasted earning potential.
THIS IS SICK, SICK, SICK!!!
This is insane on every level!
What does she portray as the benefits to this bill? Will children be paid less than minimum wage, therefore becoming another lower class to exploit?
Will children be safer under this bill?
Will this stop some form of employment abuse we were not aware of?
What is the purported benefit of this bill?
Will it keep children safer? Will it stop some form of employment abuse we were not previously aware of? Will it prevent them from being exploited as a worker class?
Or is this just another blatant attempt to remove protections of children to the benefit of business?







